http://leonardof.org/2007/08/18/my-translation-better-revision-routine/ Tradutor do GNOME para o português do Brasil Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:25:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1-alpha http://leonardof.org/2007/08/18/my-translation-better-revision-routine/#comment-242 Brazilian GNOME translation team workflow | Leonardo Fontenelle Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:17:51 +0000 http://leonardof.org/2007/08/18/my-translation-better-revision-routine/en/#comment-242 [...] See also how do I review the Brazilian GNOME translations. [...] [...] See also how do I review the Brazilian GNOME translations. [...]

]]> http://leonardof.org/2007/08/18/my-translation-better-revision-routine/#comment-169 Leonardo Fontenelle Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:11:32 +0000 http://leonardof.org/2007/08/18/my-translation-better-revision-routine/en/#comment-169 Thank you for your visit! I talked to other Brazilian GNOME translators and some of them are using pofilter, too. Someday I ought to take the time to review and report pofilter's false-positives; then we'll see if there's need for any language-specific rule. Thank you for your visit! I talked to other Brazilian GNOME translators and some of them are using pofilter, too. Someday I ought to take the time to review and report pofilter’s false-positives; then we’ll see if there’s need for any language-specific rule.

]]> http://leonardof.org/2007/08/18/my-translation-better-revision-routine/#comment-168 F Wolff Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:54:28 +0000 http://leonardof.org/2007/08/18/my-translation-better-revision-routine/en/#comment-168 Great to hear people are making pofilter part of their workflow. I want to suggest one more thing (especially for other people reading your nice blog): specify the --language=LANGCODE parameter to customise the behaviour of pofilter for the language you are reviewing. Currently it will make no difference for pt_BR, but for several languages it already provides quite an improvement in the false positives. Great to hear people are making pofilter part of their workflow. I want to suggest one more thing (especially for other people reading your nice blog): specify the –language=LANGCODE parameter to customise the behaviour of pofilter for the language you are reviewing. Currently it will make no difference for pt_BR, but for several languages it already provides quite an improvement in the false positives.

]]>